Pasolini's The Gospel According to St Matthew |
In her excellent piece on Pasolini's The Gospel According to St Matthew in this month's Sight & Sound magazine, Hannah
McGill writes the following:
Christ's miracles are rendered
not with smart special effects or coy evasions, but with crude cuts; somehow
the refusal to attempt to fool us emphasises rather than reduces the sense of
magic. The sheer scale of what the Gospels ask a true believer to accept is
rendered unavoidable.
This eloquent passage got me
thinking about how, in a sense, filmmakers ask their audience – their true believers – to accept as true
what's on the screen before them. If miracles, by definition, ask us to believe
in the impossible, is then cinema itself a miracle? Or, to put it another way,
is cinema an art (an act) of faith? Is it, in a sense, inherently a 'religious'
medium?
Just as all these thoughts were flying through my mind, a friend posted this on Facebook:
Just as all these thoughts were flying through my mind, a friend posted this on Facebook:
'It is as though movies answered
an ancient quest for the common unconscious. They fulfil a spiritual need that
people have to share a common memory' – Martin Scorsese
The idea that films fulfil a
spiritual need seemed to chime exactly with the point I was trying to grasp. I
Googled the quote and found it to be from A
Personal Journey With Martin Scorsese Through American Movies. Pulling the
book off my shelf, I located the quote, and found this preceding it:
I don't
really see a conflict between the church and the movies, the sacred and the
profane. Obviously, there are major differences, but I can also see great
similarities between a church and a movie house. Both are places for people to
come together and share a common experience. I believe there is a spirituality
in films, even if it's not one that can supplant faith. (page 166).
With this in mind, I wonder
how much of a leap it is to see a love of cinema as a faith. If we can acknowledge that holy leaders and filmmakers
alike ask us to believe in the impossible, that both film and religion fulfil a
spiritual need, and that they are both practised in houses of worship, am I
really going too far to posit cinephilia as a form of faith? Of religion?
Throughout all of this, there
is but one image burnt into my mind: the resurrection in Ordet. Where else has the act of the dead returning to life been
rendered with such heart-wrenching believability? With such straight-laced
conviction that the figures on the screen seem more real than reality itself?
We don't just believe in the miracle,
we believe in miracles, the miracle
of life – the life of those on screen, our life, life on earth. Cinema made
flesh, flesh made spirit. Transcendence.
Back in 2007, I wrote the
following in my Director's Journal for Life
Just Is:
Reading Kazantzakis, I think
I've realised why I'm interested in religion: it's because religious people
have blind faith. They believe unconditionally. To believe in anything that
wholeheartedly must be comforting.
Six years later, I realise I do believe in something that wholeheartedly.
I believe in cinema.
No comments:
Post a Comment